Nepal Electricity Authority
 

Nepal Electricity Authority

Central Office, Durbarmarg, Kathmandu

 
Corporate Office
 
Business Groups 
 
Annual Reports   
 
Major Projects
 
Access Road
Home About Us Act and Reg FAQs Contact Us
Notice Board
 
Load Shedding Schedule
 
Recruitment & Promotion ( पदपूर्ती )
31 July 2010
 
New Tel Numbers
31 July 2010
 
Tender/Prequalifications
31 July 2010
   
 
Central Activities

Introduction  NEATariff And Financial Covenants
Present  Performance SFR Covenant
Issues And Perspectives ROR Covenant
Electricity Demand Forecast (Load Forecast) Debt Service Coverage Ratio 
Power Generation Expansion Plan Financial Projection And Required Tariff Level For Nea
Power Transmission Plan Strategies For Improving Nea’s Corporate Financial Performance
Power Distribution Plan Institutional Reforms
Power Exchange Improvement In Working Capital Management
Institutional Strengthening Electricity Loss Reduction
Financial Performance.. Increase Revenue Base
Nea’s Investment Plan.. Cost Control
Generation Investment Interest Rate Reduction
Transmission Investment: Mobilization Of Local Resources 
Distribution Investment: Demand Side Management
Sources Of Financing For Nea’s Investment Plan  


List Of Tables 

Table 1: Load Forecast Study FY 2004-05.

Table 2: Capacity Balance with Planned Projects.

Table 3: Generation Expansion Plan.

Table 4: Transmission Plans for Power Evacuation.

Table  5: Transmission Plans for System Reinforcement.

Table 6: Financial Highlights.

Table 7: Investment Allocation (in million NRs.).

 
1. Introduction

This Corporate Development Plan (CDP) aims to present the strategic plans adopted by Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) for the
five-year period FY 2004/05 to FY 2008/9 with regard to its generation, transmission, distribution and other institutional strengthening activities. This CDP includes an outline of the investment plan that such infrastructure development would call for and analyse the implications on financial projections of NEA. The CDP also charts out the strategies for successfully financing the
investment plan and outlines the performance that NEA aims to attain by way of its investment plan
 
2. Present Performance

NEA presently serves 1,060,700 customers (a growth of about 9.28% over that of the previous Fiscal Year) across all the 75 districts of the country. Electricity supply is provided through ten medium-sized and forty small hydropower plants owned by NEA and ten hydropower plants owned by IPPs. Besides, four diesel and two multi-fuel thermal power plants under the ownership of NEA also cater to the demand. In terms of installed capacity of NEA’s integrated grid, hydroelectric power accounts for 549.553 MW (including 147.083 MW under private ownership) and thermal power, 56.69 MW. During the time of deficit, power up to 50 MW is imported from India as per the Indo-Nepal Power Exchange Agreement. Nepal and India have agreed in principle to increase this level of exchange from the existing 50 to 150 MW. Nepal is also entitled to 70 million units of energy annually from Tanakpur in the far west under the Mahakali Treaty and 10 MW power according to Koshi contract. Although the integrated grid has a total of 549.553 MW installed hydropower capacity, only about 459.861 MW can be generated from hydropower stations during the winter season when the power demand is at its peak.
In the area of transmission and sub-transmission of electricity, the NEA system has grown into a network of more than 1565 km of 132 kV, more than 420 km of 66 kV and around 2500 km of 33 KV power lines. Distribution and customer services are provided with lines around 8000 km of 11 kV (source: GIS maps, NEUS-2000 Report). In keeping with the HMGN policy of extending electricity services to the district headquarters, all the headquarters of the 75 districts of the country are provided with electricity. The remaining areas are being progressively electrified. In order to accelerate the pace of expansion and conduct management of rural distribution systems in a sustainable manner, NEA has adopted a concept of community participation in rural electrification schemes. The overwhelming response from user groups and cooperatives to NEA’s invitation for proposals on operating the distribution system by the community themselves has led to 80 agreements already in place.
NEA continues to be the sole purchaser of IPP's power production. To date, twenty six (26) PPAs totalling 216.047 MW have been concluded, of which 147.083 MW have already been commissioned. Out of the 16 IPP projects for which PPAs are concluded, 14 projects are expected to be commissioned by FY 2007/08 resulting in augmentation of generation capability by 58.764 MW. Another 36 requests for PPAs amounting to 81.031 MW of power are under scrutiny
 
3. Issues and Perspectives
The extremely limited investment capability of the country continues to remain one of the major impediments in the development of the Nepalese power sector. Resource mobilisation in recent years to finance development plans in the public sector has been ineffective. Similarly the current trend of private sector investment in the power sector is also not very encouraging. The continuing investment of the private sector in only small capacity plants in the 1- 5 MW range does not provide any substantial relief in meeting the growing needs of the country’s power system.
The dominance of run-off-river (ROR) and daily pondage hydropower plants in the Nepal power system has led to the creation of difficult periods of acute capacity shortage during the dry season when the demand rises sharply while the wet season sees a glut of energy available in the system which has yet to find a market. The cost involved in the relatively higher installed capacity of ROR plants has been partially responsible for the current high tariff. Attempts by NEA to amend its present tariff structure to introduce seasonal tariff in certain consumer categories to encourage the demand side management is yet to be approved by concerned authorities. The need for a suitable storage hydropower project in the system to balance the phenomenon of seasonal shortage and surplus has become acute and several donors were approached for assistance. All financial assistance to HMGN from external donors and lending institutions in the form of grants or soft loans for the power sector are channelled to NEA for project execution as an HMGN loan to NEA carrying an annual interest rate of 10.25 percent. Considering its current financial health burdened by the high cost of energy purchased from IPPs on a take or pay basis, the application of this high interest rate by HMGN even on outright grants that barely carry any risks, needs review. In addition, as prescribed in most grant assistance agreements procurement of plant, equipment and services from a limited market makes the purchase more expensive in the absence of an international competitive bidding. NEA is therefore pursuing the Government to reduce this interest rate in order to improve its financial health. This will also have a positive impact on NEA's current tariff. In addition, having identified the concept of establishing subsidiary companies and floating power bonds as feasible resource mobilisation techniques, NEA is also pursuing the government for its approval for implementing these options to raise capital from the local capital market to finance its development plans. With scarce resources from its own earnings, investment in rural electrification that does not ensure any substantial returns has always been a dilemma. NEA, however, in its attempt to make rural electrification self-sustaining, is garnering the active participation of local communities for the extension, operation, and maintenance of rural electrification schemes with a major subsidy from HMGN. In addition, NEA has also taken up rural electrification schemes through loans and grants from multilateral donors in areas that promise a reasonable rate of return.
 
4. Electricity Demand Forecast (Load Forecast)

The electricity demand forecast, covering the period up to FY 2019/20 is prepared considering the country’s macro- economic indicators and rural electrification expansion programmes. Power consumption data of FY 2004/05 has been taken as a basis for this load forecast. Total energy requirement in Nepal is projected to grow by an average of 8 percent per annum over the forecast period, from 2,299.9 GWh in FY 2003/04 to 7894 GWh in FY 2019/20. Peak demand is projected to grow from 512.2 MW in FY 2003/04 to 1733 MW in FY 2019/20. The result of the Load Forecast Study-2004/05 is presented in

Table 1: Load Forecast Study FY 2004-05

Fiscal Year

Total Generation Requirement (GWh)

System Peak Load (MW)

Peak Load Growth (%)

2003-04

2299.9

512.2

 

2004-05

2457.6

556.3

8.6

2005-06

2600.1

593.6

6.7

2006-07

2777.6

634.2

6.8

2007-08

3055.9

697.7

10.0

2008-09

3317.4

757.4

8.6

2009-10

3598.9

821.7

8.5

2010-11

3923.6

878.2

6.9

2011-12

4271.1

956.0

8.9

2012-13

4640.4

1038.7

8.6

2013-14

5032.9

1126.5

8.5

2014-15

5450.3

1220.0

8.3

2015-16

5894.5

1294.0

6.1

2016-17

6367.4

1397.8

8.0

2017-18

6842.3

1502.1

7.5

2018-19

7350.4

1613.6

7.4

2019-20

7894.0

1733.0

7.4


Note: Data given for FY 2004-05 are budgeted.

*Actual peak load in FY 2004-05 was 556.3 MW on < 8, December Month="12" Day="8" Year="2004">excluding export to Ramnagar.

 
Power Demand and Supply Situation (till 2009/10):

The capacity balance at the time of system peak up to FY 2009/2010 incorporating the planned projects as given in the Generation Expansion Plan is presented in   Table 2.

Table 2: Capacity Balance with Planned Projects

Existing Hydro

Installed

Cap.

(MW)

Peaking

Cap.

   (MW)

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

2008/09

2009/10

Total (Hydro)

574.213 488.24 488.24 488.24 488.24 488.24 488.24 488.24

Total (Thermal)

56.71 43.00 43.00 43.00 43.00 43.00 43.00 43.00
Total (Projects Under Construction)       1.5 5.1 90.4 103.4 113.4

Total (Planned Projects)

61 33.4         14 33.4

 

               
Peaking Capacity (MW)     530.24 532.74 536.34 621.64 648.64 668.04

Peak Demand (MW)

    556.30 593.60 634.20 697.70 757.40 821.70

Surplus (MW)

    -26.06 -60.86

 

-97.86

 

-76.06

 

-108.76

 

-153.66

Import Availability (MW)

    50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00

Net Surplus (MW)

    23.94 -10.86 -47.86 -26.06 -58.76 -103.66

[1]peaking capacity in the winter months of December

The Capacity Balance presented above shows that there is shortfall of supply over demand from FY 2005/06 even after utilizing the existing thermal generating capacity of NEA, the 50 MW import available under the Power Exchange Agreement with India and the limited number of planned projects that could be made available for generation in FY 2008/09 and 2009/10. Contingency measures such as increased import, utilization of available captive generation of industrial establishments and demand side management need to be explored in those years.

Considering the availability of the captive generation, which is not in appreciable quantity, the increased import and the demand side management could prove to be effective. Out of the two alternatives, the demand side management along with the use of efficient lamps in domestic households and other usages for the coming fiscal years could prove to be more effective. If a 10% penetration could be made in Name Kathmandu Type Valley only, where the peak load is more than 200 MW, the peak demand reduction will be more than 15 MW, considering 57% as lighting load (WECS report).

 
5.Power Generation Expansion Plan

A new Generation Expansion Plan study for the planning period FY 2005/06 –2019/20 was carried out. The results of the Study are presented in Table-3

Table 3: Generation Expansion Plan

FY

Projects

Installed Capacity (MW)

Comments

2005/06

Chaku Khola

1.5

IPP, PPA concluded.

2006/07

Baramchi

0.98

IPP, PPA concluded.

 

Khudi

3.5

IPP, PPA concluded.

 

Sisne Khola

0.75

IPP, PPA concluded.

2007/08

Pheme

0.95

IPP, PPA concluded.

 

Lower Nyadi

4.5

IPP, PPA concluded.

 

Lower Indrawati

4.5

IPP, PPA concluded.

 

Mailung

5

IPP, PPA concluded.

 

Mardi

3.1

IPP, PPA concluded.

 

Thoppal Khola

1.4

IPP, PPA concluded.

 

Middle Marsyangdi

70

NEA, Under Construction.

2008/09

Daram Khola

5

IPP, PPA concluded.

 

Upper Modi

14

IPP, PPA concluded.

 

Kulekhani – III

14

NEA, Planned.

2009/10

Madi-1

10

IPP, PPA concluded.

 

Hewa

10

NEA, Planned.

 

Mewa

18

NEA, Planned.

 

Lower Modi

19

Private.

2010/11

Kabeli-A

30

Private.

 

Upper Marsyangdi -A

50

Private.

 

Rahughat

27

Private.

2011/12

Tamur

83

NEA, Planned.

 

Likhu-4

51

Private.

 

Upper Modi A

42

NEA-Private Joint Venture.

 

Chameliya

30

NEA-Private Joint Venture.

 

Budhi Ganga

20

Private.

2012/13

Upper Karnali -A

75*

NEA-Private Joint Venture.

 

Upper Seti (ST)

122

NEA, Planned.

2013/14

West Seti

75*

Private.

2014/15

Upper Tamakoshi

309

NEA-Private Joint Venture.

2015/16

-

-

 

2016/17

-

-

 

2017/18

Dudh Koshi–1 (ST)

300

 

2018/19

-

-

 

2019/20

Andhi Khola (ST)

180

 



* Nepal Entitlement from export oriented projects
 
6. Power Transmission Plan

The transmission expansion plan is based on the Load Forecast Study-2004 and the revised Generation Expansion Plan and is limited to voltage levels of 66 kV and above. The selection of transmission lines for the loads as well as the planned power plants in Nepal are based on economic evaluation of different line/tower solutions over the lifetime of the project.

The power transmission lines given in Table 4 have been proposed for power evacuation, and Table 5 for system reinforcements. NEA will build the lines for NEA generation projects, while IPPs will construct their own transmission lines to connect to the grid. Hence, IPP transmission projects are not considered here.

Table 4: Transmission Plans for Power Evacuation

S. No. Transmission Lines Proposed Year of Completion
1. Middle Marsyangdi-Marsyangdi 132 kV T/L 2007/08
2. Middle Marsyangdi-Damuli 132 kV T/L 2008/09
3. Kulekhani-III - Hetauda 132 kV T/L 2008/09

Table  5: Transmission Plans for System Reinforcement
S. No.

Transmission Lines

Proposed Year of Completion

1 Butwal – Sunauli 132 kV T/L 2006/07
2 Birgunj Corridor 132 kV T/L 2006/07
3 Thankot – Bhaktapur 132 kV T/L 2006/07
4 Khimti-Dhalkebar 220 kV T/L 2006/07
5 132 kV Chandranighapur S/S 2007/08
6 Name Modi Name Khola Name S/S Type Bay Extension 2007/08
7 Hetauda - Bardaghat 220 kV T/L 2008/09
8 Kohalpur-Lamahi-Shivapur-Butwal 132 kV Second Circuiting T/L. 2007/08
9 New Parwanipur S/S 2008/09
10 30 MVAR capacitor bank at Lamahi (West) 2008/09
11 Bharatpur-Hetauda 220 kV second circuiting T/L. 2009/10
12 20 MVAR capacitor bank at Dhalkebar (East) 2009/10
13 Tamor-Mewa-Kabeli-Hewa-Duhabi 132 kV T/L 2009/10

The result of the transmission study indicates that FY 2006/07 and 2007/08 are the most critical years in terms of system stability. Commissioning of Khimti-Dhalkebar 220 kV transmission line (to be initially charged at 132 kV) by FY 2006/07 is of paramount importance if serious transmission problems are to be averted in and after FY 2006/07. In case of any delay or otherwise, if the commissioning of this 220 kV transmission line fails to materialize by FY 2006/07, any outage of the existing Hetauda-Bharatpur 132 kV line will make system unstable.

Originally, Middle Marsyangdi power was planned to be evacuated through Marsyangdi powerhouse as well as through Damauli Substation. But due to resource constraints, the section of the line from Middle Marsyangdi to Damauli will be completed only in FY 2008/09. This will obviously decrease the reliability of power from Middle Marsyangdi, since this arrangement does not support the contingency criteria. NEA is approaching prospective donors for necessary finance for the construction of this section at the earliest.

Under the NEA Transmission and Distribution component of WB, HMGN and NEA funded Power Development Project; a 75 km long Khimti-Dhalkebar 220 kV transmission line will be built. Once commissioned, the Khimti-Dhalkebar line will enhance the reliability of the power system, and improve the voltage profile of the eastern part of the grid and pave way for power evacuation from planned projects like Upper Tamakoshi.

In FY 2009/10 Hewa (10 MW) and Mewa (18 MW) are scheduled to be completed and in the same corridor Kabeli- A (30 MW) and Tamor (83 MW) is also planned to be commissioned by the FY 2010/11 and FY 2011/12 respectively. Considering all the NEA's planned hydropower projects and several identified power projects under IPPs, power evacuation study for all these power stations were carried out. Based on this study, 132kV Tamor-Mewa-Kabeli-A - Hewa-Duhabi transmission line will be constructed by FY 2009/10. The availability of hydropower sites to be developed by IPPs in and around the Sunkoshi area has created a bottleneck in power evacuation. Several IPPs have been unable to undertake new power development initiatives in the area because of the difficulties in power evacuation. A power evacuation study of Sunkoshi area will be made in 2004/05 in order to analyze the present and future situation and recommend necessary steps for strengthening the existing transmission capabilities.

 
7. Power Distribution Plan

Population Census-2001 (National Report) shows that the population having access to electricity service has reached 40 percent with 33 percent of the population availing the service from the Grid (including BPC) and NEA off-grid facilities, the remaining 7 percent being attributed to micro hydro plants developed by local entrepreneurs and other alternate sources. The Tenth Plan aims at increasing electricity services from 33 percent to 43 percent of the population through the Grid and NEA owned off-grid power generation facilities.
Considering the above, NEA is channeling efforts and resources for the upliftment of its distribution capabilities and expansion of lines in the rural areas. A feasibility study has already been carried out for rural electrification and distribution system reinforcement covering 47 districts. With the help of JICA, NEA is undertaking a basic study master plan for the development of small hydropower projects with the objective of integrated development of remote hilly areas through rural electrification. NEA with the active support of HMGN is implementing Mid and Far Western Rural Electrification Project (under a concessional credit of Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency). Under the NEA Transmission and Distribution component of the WB/HMGN/NEA funded Power Development Project, electrification and reinforcement works in a total of 124 load centers covering 55 VDCs in the districts of Lalitpur, Bhaktapur, Nuwakot, Dhading and Kavrepalanchowk is being carried out which is expected to benefit about 37000 consumers in the region.
NEA is also implementing Rural Electrification, Distribution and Transmission Project (under ADB and OPEC loan, and HMGN-NEA funding). The Rural Electrification component will electrify new areas in 22 districts benefiting some 1,23,382 rural households of 277 Village Development Committees (VDCs) through new connections and the Distribution System Reinforcement components of the Project targets to reinforce existing distribution system for 28 schemes of 27 districts.
Under DANIDA funding, Kailali-Kanchanpur Rural Electrification Project is also under implementation by NEA. This Project is expected to benefit about 64553 households. After completion of the Project, the low voltage distribution lines will be handed over to user groups (cooperatives).
In addition to the above, NEA is implementing, with its own funding, reinforcement/ construction of existing 16 overloaded 33/11 kV distribution sub-stations in different parts of the country. NEA has also initiated additional sub-station construction works and transmission line construction works at a number of locations.
In order to provide affordable electricity supply in selected rural areas, which will help raise the living standards of people residing in such areas, facilitate establishing proper physical and social infrastructure and income generating opportunities to support sustainable economic growth in rural areas, and thus reduce disparities between rural and urban standards of living, a Rural Electrification and Renewable Energy Project is being formulated. The project will include reinforcement and development of associated transmission and distribution system in existing service areas. It will also support for developing off-grid rural renewable energy sub projects in remote areas where feasible.
To facilitate the participation of rural communities to speedy and sustainable rural electrification, NEA has introduced a special community wholesale consumer tariff at a substantially discounted rate. The rural populace now has the option of forming consumer groups and initiate electrification of their own villages. Co-operative groups so formed will also look into the distribution and customer service tasks in their area. Initial response to this new initiative has been overwhelming. This initiative is expected to help in bringing down electricity losses and promote private investment in rural electrification.
As per the projected capacity balance, the system is going to have power deficit of more than 10 MW in 2005/06 and more than 47 MW in 2006/07due to the absence of candidate projects scheduled for commissioning in the period. There are many ways of tackling this power deficit problem. They are additional power import from India , load shedding and demand side management. For additional power import from India , discussions with Indian counterparts in the Power Exchange Committee could be initiated. However, in the context of preparation of corporate strategy, it can only be considered as an alternative, not a dependable solution, as it is not in the control of the corporate alone. Load shedding could be the last alternative, as it is neither a popular nor a beneficial decision. The demand side management could be an attractive and most suitable solution. It helps deferring projects if they are in the pipeline by reducing the peak load demand. It helps reducing the consumer bill due to reduction in the consumption. The losses are minimized, thereby making benefit to the economy. Demand side management will be taken up seriously so that unpopular decisions like load shedding need not be made.

 
8. Power Exchange

As mandated by the NEA Act 2041, NEA undertakes cross border power exchange with India under the Power Exchange Agreement with the Government of India. An Indo-Nepal Power Exchange Committee undertakes implementation of the Agreement.
The quantum of exchange has been on the increase since the commencement of exchange and both countries have agreed in principle to increase the level of exchange from 50 MW to 150 MW. The enhanced exchange will be made possible with Butwal - Anandanagar 132 kV transmission links between Butwal in the Nepal side and Anandnagar in the India side. With the quantum of power exchange grown up to the acceptable extent two more tie lines between Dhalkebar and Birgunj in the Nepal side and Sitamarhi and Motihari in the India side respectively will be executed. The exchange has been directed mainly to supplement power in case of power deficiencies and emergencies. A more commercial trend is expected with the appointment of Power Trading Corporation of India as the nodal agency for India to deal with the commercial aspects of the exchange. Other acceptable methods of exchange like operating Nepalese grid in unison with Indian grid are under constant research within NEA. The Power Exchange Committee has formed a Joint Technical Committee to study the technical feasibility of interconnection between Nepalese and Indian grid systems. With the system operation interconnected or tied to Indian Grid better tie line flows are expected providing multiple mutual benefits. This will help using available power in Nepalese grid to be fully utilized and the deficit power can always be replenished from the Indian system.
 
9. Institutional Strengthening

The changing scenario in the country’s power sector brought about by liberalization of policies by HMGN to attract private sector participation pressed NEA to earnestly reassess itself and prepare to confront a competitive environment in the near future. With this objective in mind NEA chose to mould itself to operate in a more commercial environment and embarked on the path of institutional strengthening by means of internal unbundling in its organizational structure by first restructuring NEA into key distinct business entities of Generation, Transmission and System Operation, Distribution and Customer Services, Electrification and Engineering Services, each headed by a General Manager. The functions of Planning, Monitoring and Information Technology as well as Finance & Administration were retained as central services each of which is headed by a Deputy-Managing Director. Over the coming years, the functioning